John James vs Hank Pfister Important H2H Prediction Stats:

Head-to-head: James 3 - 2 Pfister

• Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), James has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Pfister has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
• Return game stats recent form: Return stats show James, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Pfister has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
• Under pressure analysis: James has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pfister has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
• Performance overview: Over the last year James has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Pfister winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
• Best surface: James has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 51% (W/L 49/ 48), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 35% (W/L 24/ 45). Pfister has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 64% (W/L 96/ 53), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
• Direct H2H matches: They have played 5 times before with James winning 3 times and Pfister being victorious 2 times. They have played 11 sets in total, with James winning 7 and Pfister winning 4. The last match between James and Pfister was at the Indianapolis, 04-08-1980, Second, Clay with Hank Pfister getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
• Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
• Deciding set H2H prediction: James and Pfister have played a deciding set 1 times, with James winning 0 times and Pfister 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
• Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with James winning 0, and Pfister 0.
• Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, James has played against opponents with an average rank of while Pfister has played against players with an average rank of .
• Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, James has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pfister has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
• Break point conversion: In recent form, James has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pfister has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
• If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)